Once again I turn my attention to info-graphics.

This one by Fast Company is really neat, even if you aren’t particularly interested in the shake-up between Blackberries, iPhones and the attack of the Androids.
Once again I turn my attention to info-graphics.

This one by Fast Company is really neat, even if you aren’t particularly interested in the shake-up between Blackberries, iPhones and the attack of the Androids.
Posted by Angelo Fernando on May 21, 2010 in Best Practices, Journalism, Mobile
Tags: Android, Blackberry, iPhone
“…we’re not saying you’re evil, Google–you just sometimes make us want to wear a tin hat.”
“Yes, I’m serious…there are plenty of companies that still insist on running every single tweet through multiple PR teams to make sure the messaging is spot on.”
“your diaphragm changes — your voice comes across very differently.”
“Jay Leno is one of the most compelling entertainers in the world today … It has, however, presented some issues for our affiliates.”
“Seamless connectivity and rich social experience offered by web 2.0 companies are the very antithesis of human freedom.”
Posted by Angelo Fernando on January 9, 2010 in Disruptive, New Media, Social Media, Technology
Someday the phone in your pocket will be less and less of a talking instrument, and more and more of a remote, a news conduit, a personal carbon footprint calculator, a gaming device, a…
You get the point.
But the fact is, many of our organizations are lagging in making much of our communication:
(a) Platform agnostic –a fancy way of saying it should be accessible on a Mac, PC, Windows Media device, Blackberry or iPhone
(b) Interactive –letting our visitors and audiences do something with the information, such as tagging, annotating, commenting, forwarding etc
(c) Portable –moving an applet from a web to a phone for instance.
I brought this up at a meeting recently where the topic of social networks came up. I am not a huge fan of creating one more cooler-than-yours social network, because we are all dealing with social network fatigue and it will only get worse. Making content portable to me is one way to solve it.
If we’re all going to gravitate toward “cloud computing” the mobile device might be the cloud’s best friend.
To get back to the ‘other’ functions of our mobile device, I just met with my good friend and marketing thinker, Steve England, who showed me some mind-blowing mobile applications. Granted, his phone is smarter than mine –I caught him ‘following’ Chris Brogan and Guy Kawasaki in a coffee shop! Steve’s working with a company that can print a bar code (like the one on the left) that could be scanned with any camera phone.
From an end-user perspective, these bar-codes are not only for consumer products but can act as visual cues that lead a person (like breadcrumbs?) from offline to online seamlessly, bypassing logins, account verification etc.
From a Communicator’s or Marcom manager’s perspective, these codes/icons could be even used on a touch-screen to deploy timely information to a niche opt-in group. On a wider scale, it’s being touted for emergency –and even ‘minor emergency’ alerts .
Right now, it’s probably a challenge for you to even read a PDF I send you on a phone, right? Coming soon, I may be able to reach you, even if you’ve accidentally left your phone at home, via a digital panel on a bus.
Now that would be truly ‘mobile!’
Posted by Angelo Fernando on December 10, 2008 in Best Practices, Communications, Miscellaneous, Podcasts, Social Media, Technology
Tags: iPhone, mobile bar code
Steve Jobs brushed it off with a slide. He used the Mark Twain line to note that the rumor of his death had been greatly exaggerated.
The rumor, was not a rumor but a publishing mistake –going live with a story that should have been behind a firewall. Bloomberg is not the first to make this new-media error.
The copy had the usual safeguards: “HOLD FOR RELEASE – DO NOT USE – HOLD FOR RELEASE – DO NOT USE.” There were placeholders such as “IF STOCK DROPS” leading into a sentence “…The decline is no surprise to investors…” All good intentioned.
But in the rush to do things to meet unforgiving deadlines, to hit the newsstands, and sate the digital newsfeeds, publishing must take these risks. Are we moving too fast, where we might accidentally push the button that could affect the stock price of a company?
Rumors –especially the online kind– are nothing new. United Airlines’ stock was a victim of a rumor just this week, while Yahoo! (temporarily) benefitted from the Microsoft takeover rumor that turned out to be more than a rumor.
Rumor is being slipped into the PR toolbox because it goes well with viral. Recently, there was one about the –ready for this?- Apple Nano iPhone. If you replace “rumor” with “forecast” a lot of this might make sense. The Nano iPhone story was based on a “forecast” using “unnamed sources in the supply channel.”
As we accelerate our marketing, our PR and how we generate news about organizations we represent, news, forecasting and speculating could begin to blur.
Dan Lyons, who once created the now-retired Fake Steve blog, didn’t mince his words describing Gawker, which republished the Bloomberg gaffe as “filthy hacks,” ending also with “Great work, Bloomberg. You dopes.”
Posted by Angelo Fernando on September 9, 2008 in Media, Public Relations, Social Media, Social Networks, Technology
Tags: Apple, Fake Steve, iPhone, Nano, Steve Jobs, United Airlines
Here’s what I will remember about 2007 from the perspective of marketing, social media and communications. We obsessed about these stories in PR, marketing and social media.
1. Facebook made us rethink what social networking could do for one-to-one communications.
2. Network neutrality became a debate that not just the geeks and telcos were interested in.
3. Short codes gained popularity as the new URLs, as text messaging took off. Sadly, it took the shootings at Virginia tech for universities to realize the value of this kind of messaging.
4. Mashups became more entertaining than the original. Think: the “1984″ spoof ‘commercial‘ about Hillary Clinton, viewed over 3 million times.
5. It was the year micro-blogging (with Twitter and Jaiku) got taken seriously,
6. This was the year email spam (in the form of “co-worker spam” and “PR spam”) hit a tipping point, forcing communicators to take a good hard look at databases, and how to try to target better. Not convinced? See the rumpus Wired editor, Chris Anderson’s “sorry people you’re blocked” post did.
7. A new, intriguing search engine called Mahalo (made possible by humans, not just algorithms!), the future of Wikipedia, and whether “amateurish” knowledge is helping or hurting us.
8. The toy for grown ups: the iPhone, what else?
9. Beacon, Facebook’s daring experiment with something called “social ads.”
10. Obama-mania, both here and abroad.
(cross posted from ValleyPRblog)
Posted by Angelo Fernando on December 22, 2007 in New Media, Political Campaigns, Social Media, Social Networks, Technology, World Events
Tags: Beacon, Facebook, iPhone, Jaiku, Mahalo, Mashups, Net Neutrality, Obama, Short Codes, spam, Twitter, WIRED
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Choco by .css{mayo}.